Free tool
YouTube engagement rate calculator
Likes plus comments, divided by views. Enter the numbers from any public video; the arithmetic runs in your browser.
The thumbs-up count.
Shown above the comments.
Under the video title.
Only for the subscriber-based rate.
Fill in the fields above and the engagement rate appears here. Formula: (likes + comments) ÷ views × 100
Example: (3,400 + 210) ÷ 96,000 × 100 = 3.76%
Runs entirely in your browser. Nothing you type is sent anywhere or stored.
The YouTube engagement rate formula
(likes + comments) ÷ views × 100
Both interactions are public on nearly every video (a creator can turn comments off), and so is the view count, so you can compute it for any channel without asking the creator for anything. A second version divides by subscribers instead of views. The calculator shows that one too if you enter a subscriber count, labelled separately, because the two produce different numbers from the same video and should never share a column.
Why views, not subscribers
Subscribing on YouTube does not mean seeing every upload. Most views arrive through the home feed, suggested videos and search, which YouTube fills based on how viewers respond, and plenty of subscribers subscribed years ago and stopped watching. A channel with 800,000 subscribers can have recent uploads at 20,000 views, and a channel with 15,000 can put a video in front of half a million people.
So a subscriber-based rate mostly measures how much of the subscriber base has gone quiet. Dividing by views asks the question a brand cares about: of the people this video actually reached, how many reacted.
What YouTube does not show publicly
YouTube stopped displaying dislike counts publicly in late 2021, so a video's reception is only half visible. Shares, watch time, average view duration and audience retention are visible only to the channel owner in YouTube Studio.
Watch time is the one that matters most. For a sponsored integration, the question is whether viewers were still watching when the sponsor segment arrived, and nothing on the public page answers it. If a creator will share a Studio screenshot, the retention curve around their typical integration point is worth more than any engagement rate.
Shorts and long-form are different measurements
A Short is watched in a swipe feed, and its view is counted when it starts playing. A long-form video is chosen from a thumbnail and a title. The first collects views far more cheaply than the second, so the same audience produces a very different rate by views on each format.
Keep them apart. Compute a median for a creator's Shorts and a separate one for their long-form uploads, and compare creators within a format. A channel average that blends the two mostly tells you what share of their uploads were Shorts.
Average views, and the views-to-subscribers ratio
Before engagement, the first number a brand usually wants is what a typical video actually gets. Paste the view counts from ten or more recent uploads of one format below. The median is the figure to quote; the mean is shown next to it so you can see how far a single viral upload pulls it.
Paste two or more counts to see the median and the mean.
Add the subscriber count and you get median views as a share of subscribers. It is a quick read on how much of the subscriber number is still live audience: a channel whose typical video gets a few percent of its subscriber count is selling you a smaller audience than its headline suggests.
What is a good YouTube engagement rate?
We do not print one, because we have not measured YouTube. The only engagement benchmark Cheerful publishes is for Instagram, measured on real accounts, and it divides by followers, so it is not comparable to a rate divided by views. Published YouTube figures seldom say whether they divided by views or subscribers, or whether Shorts were in the set, and those two choices move the answer by more than the difference between a good channel and a weak one.
Build the benchmark from your own shortlist instead: ten or more recent videos per creator, one format at a time, median rate by views. It is measured on the people you are actually choosing between.
What a YouTube creator charges
Engagement tells you whether a price is good value; it does not tell you the price. For that we have real numbers. Across rate cards sent in real negotiations on Cheerful, a typical video integration was quoted at $3,000 (middle half $1,500 to $5,800, 161 quotes), a dedicated long-form video at $5,000 ($2,000 to $10,000, 195 quotes), and a Short at $2,500 ($850 to $4,000, 129 quotes, in a row that pools YouTube and TikTok short-form).
The influencer rate calculator puts those next to what creators of a given size asked and what brands offered them.
Where this fits with Cheerful
One video at a time, this calculator is the whole job. Ten videos across each of thirty channels is where it stops being a reasonable afternoon. Cheerful's creator discovery searches YouTube alongside Instagram and TikTok, and post tracking keeps measuring once the campaign is live.
Frequently asked
- How do you calculate engagement rate on YouTube?
- Add a video’s likes and comments, divide by its view count, and multiply by 100. A video with 3,400 likes and 210 comments on 96,000 views is (3,400 + 210) ÷ 96,000 × 100 = 3.76%. That is engagement rate by views, which is the version that compares fairly between channels of different sizes.
- Should I divide by views or by subscribers?
- By views, for almost every purpose. Most views on YouTube come from recommendations, search and the home feed rather than from subscribers, and many subscribers never see a given upload. A subscriber-based rate mostly measures how much of the subscriber base has gone quiet. The calculator shows the subscriber version too if you enter the count, because some published figures use it, but keep the two in separate columns.
- Why are dislikes and shares not in the formula?
- Because they are not public. YouTube stopped showing dislike counts publicly in late 2021, and shares, watch time and audience retention are only visible to the channel owner in YouTube Studio. A public YouTube engagement rate is therefore likes and comments only, and it is a floor rather than a full measurement.
- Can I compare a YouTube Short with a long-form video?
- Not in the same column. Shorts are watched in a swipe feed where a view is counted when the Short starts playing, so a Short collects views far more cheaply than a ten-minute video does and its rate by views comes out on a different scale. Compute Shorts and long-form separately, take a median of each, and compare creators within a format.
- What is a good engagement rate on YouTube?
- We do not publish one, because we have not measured YouTube. The only engagement benchmark Cheerful publishes is for Instagram, divided by followers, which is not comparable to a rate divided by views. Published YouTube benchmarks rarely state their denominator or whether Shorts were included, so the honest method is to compute the median rate by views over ten or more recent videos for every creator on your shortlist and compare them with each other.
Run your next campaign
on Cheerful
From first hello to signed agreement — see how much of the work disappears.